Analysis Of Allen Ginsberg s Super Market - 986 Words

In Allen Ginsberg’s â€Å"Super market in California†, the author addresses his view on the American society. He talks about the ideal America through symbolism and famous controversial poets. Ginsberg is an American poet and one of the members of the Beats movement. Together, Allen and the Beats writers try to show the natural beauty of America that has been corrupted and lost to industrialisation. In this essay, I will address the symbolism of the setting and its representation of the America of Walt Whitman’s imagination compared to Allen Ginsberg’s view of America. In the beginning of the poem, Walt Whitman is â€Å"poking among the meats in the refrigerator and eyeing the grocery boys.† This introduction of Whitman begins by showing us that Whitman is a minority among the American population. Homosexuality was prohibited and looked down upon during 1955. When Ginsberg says â€Å"Poking at the meats,† he is implying a sexual message involving homosexuality and the use of male genitals in certain sexual acts. Ginsberg publishes this poem in 1955; the poem describes California and most of America during that time. In addition, during this time, the American civil rights movements arose and equality for gay rights began during this time. Ginsberg also seems to emphasise the solidarity of Whitman and himself. At one point, he describes Whitman as a â€Å"lonely old grubber† and when he finally meets up with him, they are walk in â€Å"open corridors together in...solitary.† The speaker and WhitmanShow MoreRelatedThe Love Song Of Alfred Prufrock Analysis1803 Words   |  8 Pagesconclusions. In this paper, I will be discussing T.S Eliot s The love Song of Alfred Prufrock† in comparison to Allen Ginsberg s A Supermarket in California. The first poem, The Love song of Alfred Prufrock by T.S Elliot, talks about a man who is quite doubtful and insecure about himself who kept questioning whether or not breaking out of his comfort zone was worth it. The second poem, A Super market in California by Allen Ginsberg follows a trip to a supermarket in California that the author

Parenting As A Blended Family - 1718 Words

Parenting in A Blended Family The family dynamics in Max Apple’s â€Å"Stepdaughters† and Amy Tan’s â€Å"A Pair of Tickets† displays some of the issues that parents, stepparents and teenagers may or may not experience. A mother’s relationship with her children has a very unique connection, especially when it comes our daughters. Being a mother or stepmother is a problematical and rewarding experience: nevertheless, a mother’s love is unconditional. How do you except someone for his or her choices on being different? Is it easier for a step-parent to see things more clearly that the biological parent? Every family has its issues. When it’s a blended family with mothers, fathers, stepchildren and other family member, those issues can become more complex to understand. There are so many aspects that make the core of a family. For example, from different lifestyles, religion, to positive and negative reinforcement from our parents to rais ing respectable teenagers. There are differences in attitudes from teenagers with biological parents and stepparents. With biological parents the relationship may have some problems, but nothing can compare to what a stepparent has to endure and try to overcome these obstacles if it possible. In Amy Tan’s â€Å"A Joy Luck Club,† Jing-mei feels the pressure of having to fill her mother’s shoes from other family members when her mother dies. Jing-mei is forced into old customs and close-minded habits which causes her to lose interest and break away from herShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of The Movie Yours Mine And Ours 997 Words   |  4 Pagesmarriages result in a blended family. A family in which both of the parents have children from previous marriages. Often the blended family shares a permanent residence. Clair Cartwright and Kerry Gibson state in their 2013 report, The effects of co-parenting relationships with ex-spouses on couples in step-families, that in th e United States in 2008, around 9% of households and around 12% of cohabiting households were blended families ( Teachman Tedrow, 2008). A blended family is an excellent placeRead MoreBlended Families Research Paper1454 Words   |  6 PagesBlended Families Did you know that one third of all children in the United States (US) are expected to live in a stepfamily before they reach the age of 18[helpguide.org 2008]? While some people consider blended families abnormal, they can be just as good as a â€Å"regular† family. With blended families becoming more common, there are more studies being done to show both the similarities and differences between â€Å"regular† and blended families. Although blended families will probably never be consideredRead MoreCurrent Laws Regarding The Number Of Legal Parents Permitted Per Child937 Words   |  4 Pagesideal of the nuclear family. It is often argued that the biological father and biological mother are the ideal parents for a child. However, according to Ryan and Jetha, â€Å"the percentage of nuclear family households has dropped from 45 to 23.5 since the 1970s† (110). Many children are being raised in ‘nontraditional’ family structures, including same-sex parent households, blended families, platonic co-parenting partnerships, single parent households, and polyamorous families. Non-biological parentsRead MoreThe Nuclear Family1625 Words   |  7 PagesToday the idea of the nuclear family being normal has changed. It is now common to see the mixture of two families connected by a second or subsequent marriage, with one or both partners having children from prior relationships, thereby creating half siblings. Prior to the advent of no-fault divorce, most commonly the idea of blended families included a stepmother or stepfather and mother or father, and stepchildren, born to one of the parents in a previous marriage. The previous marriage had beenRead MoreParenting As A Child With Special Needs1328 Words   |  6 PagesParenting in Lesbian-Gay (LGBT) or Same-Sex Couple Homes. A review study (American Psychological Association, 2005) showed no evidence that lesbian or gay parents are unfit to parent children nor are the children under their care as parents are disadvantaged psychosocially or economically as compared with heterosexual couples. Nevertheless, this study admitted that data on LGBT parents are limited (American Psychological Association, 2005). The same findings were noted in another study (TelingatorRead MoreThe Diversity Of The Family Life During The 1950s Era1265 Words   |  6 Pagesfull extent of the changes in British household diversity, examination of th e family life in the 1950s era is essential. Furthermore then to discuss the types of diversity which now exist in families today. Lone-parenting is defined as a mother or father living without a partner who then has responsibility of a dependent child and is one diversity which will be discussed in great depth. Deliberating on the size of family sizes today is necessary to see the diversity in British households. Woman inRead MoreThe Theory Used For This Particular Family1196 Words   |  5 Pages5. The theory used for this particular family really depends on what was revealed during the assessment. Based on what Sally stated, her family’s weekly schedule is â€Å"fairly hectic†, which could make attending regular therapy sessions difficult for everyone. If that is the case, they may benefit from a brief, solution-focused treatment during which the therapist will work with the family to examine alternatives/solutions to their presenting problems as opposed to the underlying root(s) of the issueRead MoreNegative Effects Of Blended Families937 Words   |  4 PagesIn today’s society, there are a variety of family structures in which children live. Normally, a traditional family consisted of a married couple and their biological children. No other persons were involved in the household except the children and their parents. Over the last several decades, we have seen a change in family structures. We see a new family structure called blended families growing every day. According to researchers, there are now more re-married couples than there are first marriedRead MoreStability In Any Family Is Important However, Building1574 Words   |  7 PagesStability in any family is important however, building and maintaining stability in a blended family is much harder due to the many variables a blended family faces. We will explore some of these challenges and the results of them. Living arrangements Living arrangements can be one of the most challenging things for a blended/step family. There is the need for everyone to feel that they have their own space when needed to just escape, while also having a sense of inclusion for all the family members.Read MoreInfluence of Culture on Parenting Practices and Child Development1141 Words   |  5 PagesInfluence of Culture on Parenting Practices and Child Development Gloria Moore MFCC 537 October 17, 2015 Professor Timothy Docheff Influence of Culture on Parenting Practices and Child Development Parenting practices and child development have a strong correlation. â€Å"Parents often like to think that children are immune to the stressful complexities and troubles of the rapidly changing adult world† (Henderson, 2011). Many adults underestimate the perception of children to the world and,

Rich Brother †Loyal to a Fault Free Essays

Pete: Loyal to a Fault â€Å"The Rich Brother,† by Tobias Wolff is the story of two brothers that from all accounts couldn’t be more different. Pete, the elder brother, is the epitome of the American Dream. He has worked hard and become an entrepreneur, has a wife and kids, and even brags about an ocean view from his home. We will write a custom essay sample on Rich Brother – Loyal to a Fault or any similar topic only for you Order Now Donald is completely opposite. He is for the most part unemployed, and although he is a spiritual person, he has been unable to find the right fit for his spirituality and bounced from religion to religion. The Rich Brother,† begins at the end of Donald’s most recent search for spirituality when he must call his brother, Pete, knowing that Pete cannot deny his brother’s need for help yet again, and asks to be picked up from the communal farm where he had been living. Throughout the story the reader sees numerous examples of Pete’s sense of responsibility toward his brother, his love and his dedication for family; however, Pete’s dominant characteristic is that he is loyal to a fault, making him an enabler of his brother’s childish ways at the same time allowing himself to be taken advantage of. The first evidence the reader has of Pete’s loyalty to his family and Donald occurs within the first few paragraphs when the reader finds out that after Donald fails to find his way living in an Ashram as a Hindu, Pete paid his extensive medical bills from an undiagnosed case of hepatitis. As adults in the â€Å"real world,† we are expect to take responsibility for our own actions by both learning from a less than ideal life experience and paying back a debt, whether through finances or with a change in future behavior. Donald doesn’t see it that way though, and appears to have no sense of the value of money and how tough it was for Pete to earn it. He also lacks the physical capability to pay his brother back because before Pete is even finished paying off Donald’s bills he has found Christianity and joined a pentecostal community and begun to speak his new truth in tongues. Donald knows that Pete will again bail him out the next time as he had done before. It is just a bit further into the story that we see Pete allow his loyalty to open himself up again to be taken advantage of when Donald demonstrates his lack of life skills, affecting the quality of life for others on the farm. This results in his being asked to leave the farm. Rather than work things out for himself, Donald calls Pete, knowing he can count on his brother for assistance to out of Paso Robles. It is no surprise that Pete’s immediate response is to state that his brother will come live with his wife and family while Donald gets on his feet. Additionally, Pete ends up driving a number of hours from Santa Cruz to physically pick his brother up because past experiences in loaning money to Donald and that of the Ashram in Berkeley, have taught Pete that simply giving Donald money is a no win situation. Donald’s non-existent life skills combined with Pete’s inability to create boundaries with his brother by saying, â€Å"no† is just another occurrence of Pete believing he is helping even though, it may not be the right thing to do for Donald in the long term. Again and again Pete’s unrelenting loyalty removes any need for Donald to fully act like an adult. Upon arriving at the gas station, Donald immediately requests money for food he has purchased, food he has consumed knowing he is unable to pay for it. Without a second thought Pete opens his wallet and produces $100, far more money than is actually owed. When Donald tries to give some of it back to his brother, Pete says, â€Å"I can’t keep track of all these nickels and dimes. Just pay me back when your ship comes in. Go on – take it! † (615). These are perhaps words parents might use with their college age child to ensure their child has enough to get them through a tough time, maybe a week during school exams or something. A parent knows that the money is not going to be paid back, just as Pete knows Donald will never pay the money back to him. This situation reinforces the idea that Pete enables Donald to take advantage of him. Just as history repeats itself, so does the cycle that is Pete and Donald. Donald once again takes advantage of his brother’s loyalty when on the drive home from the farm the brothers pick up Webster, a hitchhiker and conman. Webster spins a tale too good to be true but Donald can’t see anything other than dollar signs when Webster offers him a share in his gold mine in Peru. Pete, as most adults would have, can see the scam through Webster’s tale immediately and tries to help Donald see the truth by offering up multiple snarky comments and direct questions for Webster to answer. It’s just not enough though as Donald gives away Pete’s $100 to Webster in good faith for a share in the mine. This is a much larger issue than the fact that Donald just gave away Pete’s money and feels justified and blameless. The other issue is Pete’s – past experience should have taught Pete that Donald is incapable of understanding the value of other people’s money or material items, which is part of the reason he was asked to leave the farm. Throughout â€Å"The Rich Brother† there are so many examples of Pete being loyal to a fault, but none are as telling as when Pete and Donald argue over the money Donald has given away. The brothers fight until they can’t come to any option other than that Donald needs to get out of the car immediately at night in the middle of no where, effectively ending their co-dependent sibling relationship. By this point in life Pete should have realized that leaving Donald figure things out for himself may be the better alternative, but he just can’t. He is too loyal. Pete can’t even bear the idea of telling his wife that he left his brother along the side of the road with no where to turn. He can’t even kid himself – Pete knows that he is going to turn around and once again pick up the pieces of Donald’s mess, which will enable the cycle to repeat endlessly. All of these events lead one to wonder if Pete is a man driven by guilt. Is there any other reason that Pete, a reasonably successful man would allow himself to be taken advantage of and manipulated so often by Donald? The reader sees this manipulation when Donald questions Pete about why he has a new Mercedes, and why he chooses to skydive, all very expensive things, leaving Pete guiltily defending his choices to enjoy his success. Pete may also suffer from guilt for mistreating Donald after he underwent some sort of surgery as a child, a story that Donald adamantly recounts to Pete even though many years have passed and Pete isn’t even sure the events ever happened. Additionally, Pete avoids incurring any additional guilt on behalf of Donald by taking care of all of his needs as their mother did before she passed; a similar thought process for Pete as he doesn’t want to imagine the shame he will feel when he tells his wife why Donald is not with him. By the end of the story the reader can confidently assume that not only will Pete pick up Donald’s pieces but that he will once again put them back together for Donald, even though the best thing Pete could do for Donald would be to step back and allow Donald to take adult responsibility and find a way to put his own pieces back together, but, because absolute loyalty it is part of Pete’s nature it is also his biggest fault when dealing with his brother. How to cite Rich Brother – Loyal to a Fault, Papers

Theory of Parabolas free essay sample

A parabola is designed on a basic formula, Y=ax^2+bx+c, which allows it to achieve a curve not seen in a normal line graphed using a Y=mx+b format. To the left is a graph who’s formula is y=x^2, where a=1, b=0, and c=0. I have isolated the (a) factor to see its effects on the parabola. Below is a graph where I have changed the (a) multiple times. The result is that as the (a) decreases, the mouth of the parabola widens due to the fact that (a) is essentially the slope of the parabola. Now, watch what happens when the (a) becomes negative. Now the mouth of the parabola is opening down and as we increase (a), the parabola widens. When (a)1, the parabola closes up horizontally. So from this, we can infer that if (a) is 0, then the result will be a straight line going along the X axis which is no longer a parabola. We will write a custom essay sample on Theory of Parabolas or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Now we will look at how the (b) factor changes the parabola, below is the origional graph from the top of the paper except the red line represents the same parabola with a (b) added onto it. The original equation was Y=x^2(blue line) and the new equation is Y=x^2+x(red line). The change is moving the vertex of the parabola left ? and down ? but the shape of the parabola it’s self is unchanged. Here are some other examples of changing (b) in a parabola with a steady (a) As seen in the graph, (b) only moves the parabola to the sides and down (as the numbers increase, the vertex moves left and down and decreasing is vice versa), but somehow fails to move the parabola up past the point X=0 on its own (making the (a) negative will flip the parabola). So now we have a slope (a) and a vertex (b), but we still need our Y-intercept which will be our (c) As shown from the graph, our parabolas Y-intercepts match up with our (c) factor, completing the equation -Fun fact, the word parabola came from the Greek words para, meaning beside, and bole, meaning to throw